I have been receiving emails regarding the recently introduced Mobilink Jazz Jazba logo being copied from somewhere. According to the emails, the logo looks like Zagora logo (image below) and Jazz Jazba logo is also created using the same tutorial. The logo is not a copy, its just on the same pattern. Have you ever heard of typography and logo design? Typography is the art and technique of arranging type, type design, and modifying type glyphs. This technique is often used by Graphic designers to design cool graphics. Following is the Zagora logo.
Having said that, I think that any company needs to develop it’s own brand, and which includes image, logo, etc. Mobilink clearly failed to do so. Instead they copied the idea from some other site and launched it. It’s not hard to have a reasonably priced good logo. There are a lot of designers in Pakistan who could have done this for less than PKR 5000/-. But Mobilink did not bother to make any efforts to develop their own unique brand. Its very obvious that when you copy someone else’s idea, both lose uniqueness no matter you are targeting different markets. Have look at Jazz Jazba logo.
This causes a bad affect on Mobilink’s reputation. I think they should change the logo immediately and this time use some ‘out of the box’ technique so that no controversy arises.
Though not copied but not unique as well. Well written.
That awfully looks same. Shame on your Mobilink.
They should really change their ad agency. They will sink Mobilink boat.
Everything about the Jazz jazba is full of crap and confusion. They still have to figure out whether it is jazz jazba or such jazba.
I second that. They keep on promoting Jazz Jazba instead of Such Jazba. Whats this name anyway… Such Jazba.
agreed the logo is be similar to the zagora logo but cmon, theres so many logos out there…it can just as well be a coincidence…
in my opinion it was merely a coincidence. if we delve into the technicalities behind the making of this logo, only then we can get to the pedestal to judge if it was a copy or not. personally i don’t think mobilink can ‘or’ has copied the much jazba logo.
I think it is a pretty cool logo and the colors and all is very nice and fresh. i dont understand that just becuase the font looks alike it means its copied. I mean come’on it aint that a big deal. Give Mobilink guys a break man, they have done a great job with the ad and the package!
Its not a copy.. Copy means duplicate..
The letters are different, the colors are are much better, the name is catchy.
I like the logo..
Lets move on..
the best works always get criticized. *sigh*
doesn’t seem to be a copy to me. i comprehensively checked the tutorial and compared the two logos. no doubt on the face of it, they look similar but no… this doesn’t qualify as a copy.
I second Mubasher’s comment up there. There is no reason Mobilink needs to ‘copy’ a logo. I mean, come on. We are talking about Mobilink here, the innovator in the market. I just believe a lot of people just look at the ‘style’ and believe things are copied. Oh wait, why are all the comments appearing in the same font. Is everybody copying here?!
it surely isn’t a copy.. i agree with the comments above. thanks umayr! 🙂